In a recent clash that has captured the attention of social media, Prophet Samuel Ojie, the founder of Dynamite Global Ministry, has responded to criticisms from a social media personality known as VDM, who labeled him a “clown” and a “liar” after Ojie prophesied doom for popular Afrobeat artist Wizkid. This exchange highlights the ongoing tension between public figures and the prophetic claims made by religious leaders, especially in the context of celebrity culture in Nigeria.
On January 3, 2025, Prophet Samuel Ojie made headlines when he claimed to have received a divine revelation concerning Wizkid. He described seeing a “black cloud” and impending danger surrounding the artist and his family. The prophet urged Wizkid to reach out to him for guidance, emphasizing the seriousness of his vision. Ojie’s statements were not merely casual remarks; they were framed as urgent warnings meant to protect the artist from potential harm.
In response to Ojie’s prophecy, VDM took to social media to express his disbelief and criticism. He accused the prophet of fabricating lies for attention and financial gain, calling him a “clown” and suggesting that his prophecies lacked credibility. VDM’s comments were part of a broader skepticism that often surrounds prophetic declarations, particularly those involving celebrities who have large followings and significant influence.
VDM’s critique resonated with many who view such prophecies as opportunistic or sensationalist. He positioned himself as a voice of reason amidst what he perceives as manipulative practices by self-proclaimed prophets. His statements ignited discussions about the legitimacy of prophetic claims in contemporary society, especially in an era where social media amplifies both support and dissent.
Following VDM’s derogatory remarks, Prophet Ojie did not remain silent. He responded with a mix of defiance and sarcasm, thanking VDM for making it “easier” for him as a servant of God. This response suggests that Ojie views the backlash as validation rather than condemnation. He reiterated his belief in the authenticity of his prophetic vision and expressed confidence that his warnings are rooted in divine insight rather than personal ambition.
Ojie’s retort reflects a common theme among religious leaders who face criticism: they often frame opposition as part of their spiritual journey or mission. By positioning himself as a victim of misunderstanding or ridicule, Ojie seeks to reinforce his authority and credibility within his faith community while simultaneously appealing to those who may share his beliefs.
This incident is not isolated; it is part of a larger narrative involving Nigerian prophets and their predictions concerning celebrities. In recent years, several high-profile figures have faced similar prophetic declarations, leading to public debates about faith, authenticity, and the intersection of religion with popular culture. Critics argue that such prophecies can exploit vulnerable individuals seeking guidance or reassurance during uncertain times.
Moreover, this clash between Ojie and VDM underscores the growing tension between traditional religious practices and modern skepticism. In an age where information spreads rapidly through digital platforms, public figures like VDM can challenge established norms and call into question the motives behind prophetic declarations.
The exchange between Prophet Samuel Ojie and VDM serves as a microcosm of the ongoing discourse surrounding prophecy in contemporary society. While Ojie stands firm in his beliefs and continues to assert his prophetic authority, VDM represents a counter-narrative that challenges such claims and calls for accountability among religious leaders.
As this story unfolds, it raises important questions about faith, celebrity culture, and the role of prophecy in modern life. The public’s reaction will likely shape future interactions between prophets and critics alike, influencing how prophetic messages are perceived in an increasingly skeptical world.