The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) of Nigeria has recently made headlines by requesting a substantial budget of approximately ₦125 billion for the year 2025. This request, which reflects a staggering 215% increase from the ₦40 billion allocated in 2024, is primarily aimed at covering personnel costs and initiating preparations for the upcoming 2027 general elections. The proposal has sparked a significant debate among political parties, civil society organizations, and the general public regarding the necessity and implications of such a financial demand.
Rationale Behind the Budget Increase
Personnel Costs and Operational Needs
INEC Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, presented the budget proposal during a session with the National Assembly’s Joint Committee on Electoral Matters. He highlighted that the increase is necessitated by several factors, including:
- Rising Personnel Costs: The national minimum wage has increased, which directly impacts the operational costs for INEC as it employs over 14,700 personnel. Yakubu emphasized that the current allocation barely covers salaries, leaving critical electoral activities unfunded.
- Growing Number of Elections: The commission is preparing for multiple by-elections and off-cycle elections in addition to the major general elections scheduled for 2027. Yakubu noted that INEC would conduct 11 by-elections in 2025, which adds to the financial burden.
- Continuous Voter Registration (CVR): The chairman stressed the importance of resuming CVR to ensure that eligible voters can register ahead of future elections. He pointed out that many Nigerians have come of age since the last registration period and need to be included in the electoral roll.
Infrastructure and Logistics
Yakubu also mentioned the need for funding to rehabilitate electoral infrastructure, citing that around 860 buildings nationwide were damaged and require repair. Additionally, logistical support for distributing materials to polling units is crucial for ensuring credible elections.
Political Reactions
The budget request has elicited mixed reactions from various political parties:
- All Progressives Congress (APC): The ruling party has generally supported INEC’s request, recognizing the need for adequate funding to ensure smooth electoral processes.
- Opposition Parties: In stark contrast, opposition parties like the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) have criticized INEC’s request as excessive and potentially misused. PDP Deputy National Youth Leader Timothy Osadolor described the funds as “reward money” for electoral misconduct, questioning INEC’s integrity given past controversies surrounding election management.
- New Nigeria Peoples Party (NNPP): This party called for INEC to implement cost-cutting measures instead of seeking increased funding. They suggested exploring collaborations with financial institutions to streamline voter registration processes and reduce costs.
- African Democratic Congress (ADC): The ADC expressed concerns about politicians burdening INEC with undemocratic practices that complicate its operations. They argued that adequate funding is essential for maintaining democratic integrity in Nigeria.
Implications for Democracy
The debate surrounding INEC’s budget request highlights broader issues within Nigeria’s democratic framework. Critics argue that without visible improvements in electoral credibility, any increase in funding may be viewed with skepticism. Many citizens remain disillusioned with past elections marred by allegations of fraud and mismanagement.
The Need for Transparency and Accountability
For INEC to gain public trust regarding its budget proposal, it must demonstrate transparency in how funds will be utilized. There is a pressing need for accountability mechanisms to ensure that resources are directed towards improving electoral processes rather than enriching individuals within the commission or perpetuating corrupt practices.
Enhancing Electoral Integrity
Investing in INEC is not merely about funding; it is about enhancing Nigeria’s electoral integrity. As highlighted by various stakeholders, credible elections are fundamental to democracy. If citizens perceive that their votes count and that elections are conducted fairly, they are more likely to engage positively in the democratic process.
Conclusion
The Independent National Electoral Commission’s request for ₦125 billion to prepare for 2025 operations and subsequent elections underscores a critical juncture in Nigeria’s democratic journey. While there are legitimate reasons behind this demand ranging from personnel costs to infrastructural needs the response from political parties and civil society indicates a deep-seated concern about governance and accountability.
As discussions continue within legislative chambers and among the public, it becomes imperative for INEC to articulate a clear plan on how this funding will translate into tangible improvements in Nigeria’s electoral landscape. Only through effective management of resources can INEC hope to restore faith in its capabilities and ensure that future elections reflect the will of the people.